送交者: 张晓宁很快被拜登！ 于 March 21, 2023 12:15:14:
作者: 刘刚 胡平论证“张晓宁不是中共杀手”，无异于论证“此地无银” 2022-05-31 03:49:10 [点击:8964]
原文网址：http://jasmine-action.blogspot.com/2022/05/blog-post_64.html
胡平发文论证“ 张晓宁不可能是中共杀手 ”，下面是我对胡平该文的评论。
“张晓宁是什么”，这是一个有限集合。
而“张晓宁不是什么”，则是一个无穷大集合。
从一个无穷大集合中使用排除法，来寻求“张晓宁是什么”的答案，那是徒劳的。追问和研究“张晓宁不是什么”是毫无意义的，不会让人了解“张晓宁是什么”的任何细节，不会给出任何有意义的答案。
胡平是一个哲学家，为何要提出这种不会给出任何有意义的答案的问题呢？
追问和论证“张晓宁不是什么”无异于论证“此地无银三百两”、“隔壁阿三不曾偷”！
胡平即便是证明了“张晓宁不是共谍杀手”，胡平还会提出无穷多个类似的问题来误导人们，诸如：
张晓宁不是孕妇
张晓宁不是傻子
张晓宁不是石头
张晓宁不是猴子
等等等等，最终一定会将所有的人都给带到沟里。
另有一些人，比如魏京生和李洪宽等人，在千方百计地证明“张晓宁是专业杀手”。这也是一个毫无意义的问题。美国是一个法制国家，证明张晓宁是专业杀手要拿出证据，而不是凭某些人的主观臆测。
李洪宽给出的证据是张晓宁只是捅了四刀，而非专业杀手不会只捅四刀。这个推论根本不能被法庭接受。
能证明张晓宁是“专业杀手”也不是不可能。美国法庭能够接受的证据就是张晓宁曾经在某地接受过某些人的专业杀人训练。但是，如果有人能向法庭提供了张晓宁曾经接受过杀人训练的证据，那也就无需争论张晓宁是否为“专业杀手”这个同杀人罪没什么关系的问题，而是能直接证明张晓宁就是团伙合谋杀人，必定是一级谋杀了。
所以，那些拼命宣扬“张晓宁是专业杀手”的人，同宣扬“张晓宁不是专业杀手”的人一样，都是在误导舆论，在搅混水，让人们去争论一些似是而非的问题，而掩盖那些同张晓宁案密切相关的人，诸如：
谁是张晓宁的房东和同屋？
谁是张晓宁在纽约最早的联络人？
谁首先从杀人现场向外扩散张晓宁谋杀李进进的消息？
谁指导张晓宁在监狱里住进精神病看护病房？
等等能够查出张晓宁同伙的线索。
可以肯定地说，纽约的很多民运人物都知道上述问题的答案，可他们就是在拼命掩盖这些问题。
比如，何频、易改、王丹等人就是不肯交代是谁告知他们张晓宁行刺李进进的消息。
李洪宽在视频中发布了众多张晓宁在自家居室里的生活照，这一定是张晓宁的室友或房东提供的，可李洪宽就是不说出是何人向他提供了张晓宁的这些生活照。
如果何频、易改、王丹、李洪宽等人讲出他们所知道的真相，张晓宁的幕后同伙和帮凶就会浮出水面。
胡平为何不去追问究竟是谁从现场向外界扩散了张晓宁谋杀李进进的消息？
胡平为何不追问究竟是谁告知何频、王丹、易改等人李进进被谋杀的消息？
胡平为何不去追问李洪宽从何处得到了张晓宁的生活照？
r e l a x@aristotle2727 ：他们都知道，但又都不说。到底在掩盖神马呢？
他们都知道真相。
他们也都知道我们知道他们知道真相。
可他们就是要掩盖真相。
而且还要千方百计地阻挠我们去探索真相，
更要设法误导我们去相信他们散布的各种烟幕假象。
胡平还居然说“张晓宁是不是精神病，要由法医来认定。”
胡平怎么不说“张晓宁是不是精神病，要由兽医来认定”啊？
刘刚
2022年5月30日
附录：胡平 张晓宁不可能是中共杀手 2022-05-30 16:05:15 [点击:145]
http://duping.net/XHC/show.php?bbs=11&post=1452908
据报道，4月13日上午，杀害李进进律师的凶犯张晓宁在纽约市皇后区高等法院出庭。张晓宁被大陪审团起诉六项罪名，分别是二级谋杀罪、两项四级刑事持有武器罪、三级威胁、刑事妨碍呼吸或血液循环、二级骚扰。如果罪名成立，凶犯张晓宁将会面临最高25年至终身监禁。
注意：在起诉张晓宁的六项罪名中，不包含张晓宁被中共派遣跨境行凶这一类指控。我们知道，张晓宁的案子曾经一度移交联邦法院，后来又送回州法院。这或许说明有关方面并不是没有考虑过凶犯是中共派遣的特工跨境杀人这种可能性，只不过在调研后排除了这种可能性。
（一）
我不认为张晓宁是中共派遣的杀手。理由如下：
第一、一个年仅26岁的女性，自愿接受党国的指令，甘冒失去生命、至少也是失去青春的极端风险，去杀害一个素不相识的和自己毫无个人恩怨的人。这可能吗？在今日中国，共产党还能找到这样极度狂热的甘为党国献身的死士吗？我认为非常不可能。
第二、就算张晓宁是这样的刺客，那么，党国向她交代任务时，必定会告诉她接近李进进律师的途径，因而她到美国来就会直接找到李进进，哪里会像现在这样，去年8月就到纽约了，今天找张三，明天找李四，几经辗转，四个多月后才接触到李进进？
第三、既然找到刺杀目标了，杀手就该立即采取行动。因为李进进律师并没有受到特殊保护，那么凶手完全可以设计一种可以脱身的杀害方式，怎么会选在李进进的办公室行凶，以至于行凶后无处可逃，只得束手就擒呢？
第四、李进进是在3月14日星期一被张晓宁杀害的。在出事前三天，3月11日星期五，张晓宁就去了一趟李进进律师楼，并且进入了李进进的办公室，她为什么在那时不动手呢？为什么还要等到三天后才动手呢？
第五、在3月11日星期五进入李进进办公室期间，张晓宁曾经对李进进突施一招“锁喉”动作。如果张晓宁是中共杀手，那么她一定会尽力避免在正式动手之前做出任何可能引起李进进警惕的行为，那她为什么要对李进进突施“锁喉”动作呢？那岂不会引起李进进的警觉和防范，因而导致她的刺杀行动无法实行吗？在当时，李进进的秘書见状報警，警察很快赶到，本来是要為李进进申请人身安全保护令的，只是李进进出于善意，担心张晓宁落了案底，影响以后申办在美国的居留身份，于是没办人身保护令。三天后的3月14日星期一，张晓宁又来到了李进进的律师楼，秘书就因为她在三天前的暴力袭击行为，不准她进门。只是随后李进进来了，出于好心又让张晓宁进来了，这才使得张晓宁有了行凶的机会。假如张晓宁果真是中共派来的杀手，她就绝不会在正式行凶前对李进进做出任何暴力袭击行为，而张晓宁偏偏就做了，可见她并不是从一开始就早有预谋要杀害李进进，可见她并不是中共杀手。
除非你能把上述5点都驳倒，你才能说张晓宁是中共杀手。
（二）
有律师分析，张晓宁的律师非常可能以精神疾病为由为张晓宁提供辩护。
不少人也认为张晓宁是精神病，因为从正常人的角度，她的暴行没法解释。不过，就在不久前南加州教堂开枪行凶的那个周文伟，还有在德州一所小学开枪打死21人的凶手萨尔瓦多·拉莫斯，他们的暴行从正常人的角度也很难解释，但是很多人并不因此就认为他们是精神病。
据悉，张晓宁的代理律师拟向法院申请为张晓宁做司法精神鉴定。
张晓宁是不是精神病，要由法医来认定。如果法医认定不是精神病，张晓宁自然就要负刑事责任。如果法医认定张晓宁是精神病，也不等于张晓宁就一定可以免去刑事责任。精神病人杀人是否要负刑事责任，不可一概而论，需要根据精神病人的实际情况来决定。关键在于他/她行为时是否具有辨认或者控制自己行为的能力。根据不同的情况，有的要负刑事责任，有的可从轻处罚，有的不负刑事责任。
如果凶手被认定为精神病而免除刑事责任，为了防止凶手对他人可能的伤害，凶手一般会送到精神病院严加监管。以刺杀里根总统的凶手小约翰·欣克利(John Hinckley Jr.)为例。1981年3月30日，欣克利在华盛顿特区一家酒店外刺杀里根总统，未遂。在法庭上，陪审团以精神错乱为由判定欣克利无罪，免予刑事责任。随后，欣克利就被送进精神病院，接受严格的监管和治疗。这一住就是30多年，后来又被转送到一家精神健康机构。2021年，欣克利获得无条件释放。
《光传媒》首发。2022年5月30日。链接：https://ipkmedia.com/142882/
美华人盗商业机密案定罪 麻萨诸塞州首宗
所有跟贴·加跟贴·论坛主页
送交者: 防骗防贼防谍防华人 于 May 31, 2022 03:41:22:
美华人盗商业机密案定罪 麻萨诸塞州首宗
使用前雇主、芯片巨头ADI的设计 制造仿冒版本 最高面临10年监禁
美华人盗商业机密案定罪 麻萨诸塞州首宗
资料照，图为约翰‧约瑟夫‧莫克利联邦法院（John Joseph Moakley United States Courthouse）。(Learner Liu/The Epoch Times)
更新 2022-05-31 12:13 AM 人气 8964 标签: 盗窃商业机密, 芯片, 华人 Facebook Twitter Line 复制链接 Print【字号】 大 中 小正体 简体
【大纪元2022年05月30日讯】（大纪元记者蔡溶纽约报导）美国麻萨诸塞州勒星顿镇华人余浩洋（Haoyang Yu，音译）因“占有从前公司盗窃的商业机密”，上周四被联邦陪审团定罪。波士顿联邦检察官办公室在周六（28日）的一份声明中称其为“麻萨诸塞州地区此类刑事审判中，首宗定罪案件”。
43岁的余浩洋在经过长达一个月的陪审团审判后被判有罪，罪名是拥有名为HMC1022A的微芯片原型设计，该芯片由总部位于威尔明顿的半导体制造商、芯片巨头“Analog Devices, Inc.”（ADI）开发和拥有。这种芯片用于航空航天和国防应用。余浩洋曾为自己的公司制造“仿冒”版本。
余浩洋出生于中国哈尔滨，于2002年到美国留学，从2014年到2017年在ADI工作，开发设计可用于通信、国防和航空航天行业的微芯片。
由于工作需要，他可以访问ADI公司与当前和未来的微芯片设计相关的数据和信息，包括其原理图文件、设计布局文件和制造文件。
起诉书指控，余浩洋在担任ADI员工期间，创办了自己的微芯片设计公司“Tricon MMIC, LLC”，并使用盗来的HMC1022A设计制造了ADI芯片的仿冒版本，为自己公司的“国防和航空航天、测试和仪器，及卫星通信”客户提供服务。
余浩洋在ADI发布其芯片之前就开始销售他的仿冒HMC1022A版本微芯片。ADI全力配合政府的调查。
但是陪审团裁决余浩洋除一项罪名成立外，其余17项罪名不成立：包括电信欺诈、移民欺诈（在提交入籍申请时未披露有关盗窃ADI商业秘密的信息）、非法出口受控技术，和其它11项持有窃取的商业机密罪。
余浩洋的两名代理律师William Fick和Daniel Marx声称，余浩洋是因为其种族才成为联邦检察官的目标，是“基于中国血统的非法定性和定位”，因此要上诉。他们说，这项动议正在等待裁决。
持有被盗商业机密的指控最高可判处10年监禁、3年监外看管和25万美元罚款，当地法官杨威廉（William G. Young）定于今年9月15日对余浩洋量刑。
责任编辑：陈玟绮 ＃
Author: Liu Gang/Hu Ping's argument that "Zhang Xiaoning is not a CCP killer" is tantamount to arguing that "there is no silver here"
All Posts · Add Posts · Forum Homepage
Sent by: Zhang Xiaoning will soon be Biden! On December 21, 2022 05:53:03:
Author: Liu Gang Hu Ping's argument that "Zhang Xiaoning is not a CCP killer" is tantamount to arguing that "there is no silver here"
Sent by: Zhang Xiaoning was soon Biden on June 27, 2022 12:25:40:
Author: Liu Gang and Hu Ping's argument that "Zhang Xiaoning is not a CCP killer" is tantamount to arguing that "there is no silver here" 2022-05-31 03:49:10 [Click: 8964]
Original URL: http://jasmine-action.blogspot.com /2022/05/blog-post_64.html
Hu Ping published an article arguing that "Zhang Xiaoning cannot be the killer of the CCP". The following is my comment on Hu Ping's article.
"What is Zhang Xiaoning", this is a limited set.
And "Zhang Xiaoning is nothing" is an infinite set.
It is futile to seek the answer of "what is Zhang Xiaoning" by using the method of elimination from an infinite set. It is meaningless to ask and study "what Zhang Xiaoning is not", it will not let people know any details of "what Zhang Xiaoning is", and it will not give any meaningful answers.
Hu Ping is a philosopher, why ask such a question that does not give any meaningful answer?
Asking and arguing "what Zhang Xiaoning is not" is tantamount to arguing "there is no silver three hundred taels here" and "the neighbor next door never stole it"!
Even if Hu Ping proves that "Zhang Xiaoning is not a spy killer", Hu Ping will still ask infinitely similar questions to mislead people, such as:
Zhang Xiaoning is not a pregnant woman
Zhang Xiaoning is not a fool
Zhang Xiaoning is not a stone
Zhang Xiaoning is not a monkey
Wait, wait, etc., and eventually everyone will be brought into the ditch.
Others, such as Wei Jingsheng and Li Hongkuan, tried their best to prove that "Zhang Xiaoning is a professional killer". This is also a pointless question. The United States is a country with the rule of law. To prove that Zhang Xiaoning is a professional killer must produce evidence, rather than relying on some people's subjective speculation.
The evidence given by Li Hongkuan is that Zhang Xiaoning only stabbed four times, and non-professional killers would not only stab four times. This inference simply cannot be accepted by the courts.
It is not impossible to prove that Zhang Xiaoning is a "professional killer". The evidence acceptable to American courts is that Zhang Xiaoning once received professional killing training from certain people in a certain place. However, if someone can provide the court with evidence that Zhang Xiaoning has received training in murder, then there is no need to debate whether Zhang Xiaoning is a "professional killer" which has nothing to do with the crime of homicide, but can directly prove that Zhang Xiaoning is a gang murderer. Must be first degree murder.
Therefore, those who desperately proclaim that "Zhang Xiaoning is a professional killer" are just like those who proclaim that "Zhang Xiaoning is not a professional killer". persons closely related to the case, such as:
Who is Zhang Xiaoning's landlord and roommate?
Who was Zhang Xiaoning's earliest contact person in New York?
Who first spread the news of Zhang Xiaoning's murder of Li Jinjin from the murder scene?
Who directed Zhang Xiaoning to be admitted to the psychiatric care unit in the prison?
Wait until we can find clues to Zhang Xiaoning's accomplices.
It can be said with certainty that many pro-democracy activists in New York know the answers to the above questions, but they are trying their best to cover up these questions.
For example, He Pin, Yi Gai, Wang Dan and others just refused to explain who informed them of Zhang Xiaoning's assassination of Li Jinjin.
In the video, Li Hongkuan released many photos of Zhang Xiaoning’s life in his own living room, which must have been provided by Zhang Xiaoning’s roommate or landlord, but Li Hongkuan did not say who provided him with these photos of Zhang Xiaoning’s life.
If He Pin, Yi Gai, Wang Dan, Li Hongkuan and others tell the truth they know, Zhang Xiaoning's accomplices and accomplices behind the scenes will surface.
Why didn't Hu Ping ask who actually spread the news of Zhang Xiaoning's murder of Li Jinjin from the scene to the outside world?
Why didn't Hu Ping ask who told He Pin, Wang Dan, Yi Gai and others that Li Jinjin was murdered?
Why didn't Hu Ping ask where Li Hongkuan got Zhang Xiaoning's life photos?
relax@aristotle2727 : They all know it, but they don't say it. What are you trying to cover up?
They all know the truth.
They also all know that we know they know the truth.
But they just want to cover up the truth.
Moreover, they have to do everything possible to prevent us from exploring the truth,
and even try to mislead us into believing the various smoke screens they spread.
Hu Ping actually said, "Whether Zhang Xiaoning is mentally ill or not depends on the forensic doctor."
Why didn't Hu Ping say "whether Zhang Xiaoning is mentally ill or not, it's up to the veterinarian to determine"?
Liu Gang
May 30, 2022
Addendum: Hu Ping and Zhang Xiaoning Ca n’t Be CCP Killers
According to reports, on the morning of April 13, Zhang Xiaoning, the murderer who killed lawyer Li Jinjin, appeared in court in the Superior Court of Queens, New York City. Zhang Xiaoning was indicted by the grand jury on six counts, namely second-degree murder, two fourth-degree criminal possession of weapons, third-degree threats, criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation, and second-degree harassment. If convicted, the murderer Zhang Xiaoning will face up to 25 years to life in prison.
Note: Among the six charges against Zhang Xiaoning, the accusation that Zhang Xiaoning was sent across the border by the CCP to commit murder was not included. We know that Zhang Xiaoning's case was transferred to the federal court at one time, and then sent back to the state court. This may show that the relevant parties have not considered the possibility that the murderer was an agent sent by the CCP to kill across the border, but this possibility was ruled out after investigation.
(one)
I don't think Zhang Xiaoning is a killer sent by the CCP. The reasons are as follows:
First, a 26-year-old woman voluntarily accepts the order of the party-state, willing to risk her life, or at least her youth, to kill a stranger who has no personal grievances with her. is it possible? In today's China, can the Communist Party still find such extremely fanatical dead soldiers who are willing to sacrifice their lives for the party and the country? I think it's very unlikely.
Second, even if Zhang Xiaoning is such an assassin, then when the party and the state give her the task, they will definitely tell her how to approach Li Jinjin's lawyer, so when she comes to the United States, she will find Li Jinjin directly. Arrived in New York, looking for Zhang San today, and Li Si tomorrow, after several twists and turns, it took more than four months before I came into contact with Li Jinjin?
Third, since the assassination target has been found, the killer should take immediate action. Because lawyer Li Jinjin was not under special protection, the murderer could devise a method of killing that allowed him to escape. How could he choose to commit the murder in Li Jinjin's office, so that he had nowhere to escape after the murder and had to be arrested without a fight?
Fourth, Li Jinjin was killed by Zhang Xiaoning on Monday, March 14th. Three days before the accident, on Friday, March 11, Zhang Xiaoning went to Li Jinjin's lawyer's office and entered Li Jinjin's office. Why didn't she do anything then? Why wait until three days before doing it?
Fifth, when entering Li Jinjin's office on Friday, March 11, Zhang Xiaoning once performed a "lock throat" movement on Li Jinjin. If Zhang Xiaoning is the killer of the CCP, then she will try her best to avoid any actions that may arouse Li Jinjin's vigilance before she officially takes action. Then why did she suddenly "lock the throat" on Li Jinjin? Wouldn't that arouse Li Jinjin's vigilance and precautions, thus making her assassination impossible? At that time, Li Jinjin’s secretary called the police when he saw the situation, and the police arrived very quickly. He originally wanted to apply for a personal safety protection order for Li Jinjin, but Li Jinjin was out of goodwill and worried that Zhang Xiaoning’s criminal record would affect his future application for residence status in the United States. So no writ of habeas corpus was issued. Three days later, on Monday, March 14, Zhang Xiaoning came to Li Jinjin's lawyer's office again. The secretary refused to let her in because of her violent attack three days ago. It was only later that Li Jin came in and let Zhang Xiaoning in out of good intentions, which gave Zhang Xiaoning a chance to commit murder. If Zhang Xiaoning was indeed a killer sent by the CCP, she would never have committed any violent attack on Li Jinjin before the official attack, but Zhang Xiaoning just did it. It can be seen that she did not plan to kill Li Jinjin from the beginning. It can be seen that she is not a CCP killer.
Unless you can refute all the above 5 points, you can say that Zhang Xiaoning is the killer of the CCP.
(two)
Some lawyers analyzed that Zhang Xiaoning's lawyers are very likely to defend Zhang Xiaoning on the grounds of mental illness.
Many people also think that Zhang Xiaoning is mentally ill, because from the perspective of normal people, her atrocities cannot be explained. However, Zhou Wenwei, who shot and killed 21 people in a church in Southern California not long ago, and Salvador Ramos, who shot and killed 21 people in an elementary school in Texas, their atrocities are difficult to explain from the perspective of normal people , but many people do not think they are mentally ill because of this.
It is reported that Zhang Xiaoning's attorney intends to apply to the court for a judicial psychiatric appraisal for Zhang Xiaoning.
Whether Zhang Xiaoning is mentally ill or not depends on the forensic doctor. If the forensic doctor determined that he was not mentally ill, Zhang Xiaoning would naturally be held criminally responsible. If the forensic doctor determines that Zhang Xiaoning is mentally ill, it does not mean that Zhang Xiaoning will definitely be exempted from criminal responsibility. Whether a mental patient should bear criminal responsibility for murder cannot be generalized, and it needs to be decided according to the actual situation of the mental patient. The key is whether he or she acts with the ability to recognize or control his/her own behavior. According to different circumstances, some should bear criminal responsibility, some can be given a lighter punishment, and some should not bear criminal responsibility.
If the murderer is found to be mentally ill and exempt from criminal responsibility, in order to prevent the murderer from harming others, the murderer will generally be sent to a mental hospital for strict supervision. Take President Reagan assassin John Hinckley Jr., for example. On March 30, 1981, Hinckley attempted to assassinate President Reagan outside a hotel in Washington, DC. In court, the jury acquitted Hinkley of criminal responsibility on the grounds of insanity. Subsequently, Hinckley was sent to a mental hospital, where he received strict supervision and treatment. This stay lasted for more than 30 years, and was later transferred to a mental health institution. In 2021, Hinckley will be released unconditionally.
"Light Media" debuted. May 30, 2022. Link: https://ipkmedia.com/142882/
American and Chinese convicted of stealing commercial secrets case in
Massachusetts
.
American and Chinese convicted in the case of stealing trade secrets The first case in Massachusetts
to use the design and manufacture of counterfeit versions of the former employer, chip giant ADI, facing up to 10 years in prison
American and Chinese convicted in the case of stealing trade
secrets John Joseph Moakley United States Courthouse. (Learner Liu/The Epoch Times)
Updated 2022-05-31 12:13 AM Popularity 8964 Tags: Theft of trade secrets, chip, Chinese Facebook Twitter Line Copy link Print [Font Size] Large, Medium, Small, Regular, Simplified
[The Epoch Times, May 30, 2022] Daily News (Reported by Epoch Times reporter Cai Rong in New York) Yu Haoyang (Haoyang Yu, transliteration), a Chinese in Lexington Township, Massachusetts, USA, was convicted by a federal jury last Thursday for "possessing trade secrets stolen from a former company." The U.S. Attorney's Office in Boston called it "the first conviction of its kind in a criminal trial of its kind in the district of Massachusetts" in a statement Saturday.
Haoyang Yu, 43, was found guilty after a month-long jury trial of possessing a prototype microchip called the HMC1022A, designed by Wilmington-based semiconductor maker and chip giant Analog Devices. , Inc.” (ADI) developed and owned. Such chips are used in aerospace and defense applications. Yu Haoyang once made a "counterfeit" version for his own company.
Yu Haoyang was born in Harbin, China, studied in the United States in 2002, and worked at ADI from 2014 to 2017, developing and designing microchips that can be used in the communications, defense and aerospace industries.
As required by his job, he has access to ADI's data and information related to current and future microchip designs, including its schematic files, design layout files, and manufacturing files.
The indictment alleges that Yu Haoyang founded his own microchip design company "Tricon MMIC, LLC" during his tenure as an employee of ADI, and used the stolen HMC1022A to design and manufacture a counterfeit version of the ADI chip for his company's "defense and aerospace industry". , testing and instrumentation, and satellite communications" customers.
Haoyang Yu started selling his counterfeit HMC1022A version of the microchip before ADI released its chip. ADI is fully cooperating with the government's investigation.
However, the jury found Yu Haoyang not guilty of 17 charges except for one charge: including wire fraud, immigration fraud (not disclosing information about the theft of ADI trade secrets when submitting a naturalization application), illegal export of controlled technology, and 11 others. One count of possession of stolen trade secrets.
Yu Haoyang's two lawyers, William Fick and Daniel Marx, claimed that Yu Haoyang became the target of federal prosecutors because of his race, which was "illegal characterization and positioning based on Chinese ancestry", so he wanted to appeal. The motion is pending, they said.
The charge of possessing stolen trade secrets carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, 3 years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. Local Judge William G. Young is scheduled to sentence Yu Haoyang on September 15 this year.
Responsible editor: Chen Wenqi#
All posts: