送交者: 民主党亂倫禽兽不如 于 March 12, 2026 08:53:50:
七成美国人不希望拜登再连任。八成美国人希望牠死。九成美国人知道拜登扒灰亂倫 - 拜登家跌入死牢!
何清涟：美国民主一线命脉悬在投票机上
何清涟：美国民主一线命脉悬在投票机上
多米尼选举机器在选举安全方面的缺陷并非秘密。图为Dominion触屏投票机。（李文净／大纪元）
更新 2022-06-27 2:25 AM 人气 8964 标签: 美国中期选举, 三项指标, 2000头骡子, 多米尼投票机 Facebook Twitter Line 复制链接 Print【字号】 大 中 小正体 简体
【大纪元2022年06月27日讯】2022年中期选举将至，多家评论认为，共和党人拥有许多有利要素：一位不受欢迎的总统，令正常社会成员抓狂的民主党社会基础，以及无法甩锅给他人的41年以来最高通胀。因此，共和党这边信心满满，预期最好的战绩将包括赢回众议院甚至参议院，并且能够保住其在州议会和州长职位上的多数席位。共和党的信心并非毫无凭据。著名调查机构盖洛普在6月中旬发布的一份报告中称，“2022年很有可能是共和党迎来压倒性胜利的一年。”
盖洛普：中期选举三项常规指标均低迷
盖洛普在这份报告中调查了对美国中期选举结果有指示作用的三项指标：现任总统的民意支持率、国会的民意支持率和民众对现状的满意程度。
盖洛普报告显示，目前民众对拜登的满意程度为约41%。与历任美国总统在中期选举前的支持率相比，目前拜登41%的支持率处于较低的水平，与川普在2018年大选时的支持率相同，当时共和党失去了40个众议院席位，美国前总统里根在1982年的支持率为42%，也曾令共和党失去26个席位。
报告显示，目前美国国会的民众支持率为18%，是自1974年以来的最低点。报告表示，在奥巴马的第一任期内，国会的支持率为21%，民主党失去了63个席位；2018年川普在任时国会的支持率为21%，共和党失去了40个席位。
同时，这份报告还显示，目前美国民众对国内现状的满意度为16%，这是自2010年以来的最低点。
报告称，根据已经公布的多州初选结果，民主党很有可能在11月的中期选举中遭受“重大冲击”，并重蹈1994年和2010年中期选举的覆辙，当时民主党在选后失去了大量国会席位和国会控制权。
不独盖洛普的民调结论如此，538网站通过分析各种各样的民调结果和使用自己的民调评分系统来评估拜登的支持率，截至美东时间6月24日，拜登的支持率为39.2%，不支持拜登的比例为55.3%。
共和党是否就可以高枕无忧地躺赢？我的看法是：有2020年选举经验在，不可太过乐观。
2000头骡子：2020大选舞弊的冰山一角
今年5月2日开始，在全美250多家影院公映一部纪录片《2000头骡子》（2000 Mules），该影片聚焦2020年大选中摇摆州涉嫌选民欺诈和填塞选票的犯罪行为，由保守派活动家迪内什·德索萨（Dinesh D’Souza）制作。“骡子”一名的由来，乃因共和党党徽是红色的像，民主党是蓝色的驴子，“骡子”则被用来称呼2020年大选中受雇的中介。影片借助手机信号追踪、数字地理围栏（geofencing），以及缺席选票投票箱的监控录像，显示出成千上万“骡子”受雇非法收集和投递了数十万张缺席选票，使得大选结果发生改变。
《2000头骡子》记录了保守派选举情报组织True the Vote的研究，该组织收集了乔治亚、亚利桑那、宾夕法尼亚、威斯康星、密歇根和得克萨斯等六州有组织的选票贩运的证据。以乔治亚州为例，True the Vote声称，在凌晨12点到5点之间，有242位“骡子”前往投票箱5662次，可能在几周的时间内将数十万张非法获得的选票塞到投票箱里。骡子们的雇用者，是一些寄生于民主党旗下的NGO，长年收受民主党的拨款、为民主党干脏活儿维生。其中宾夕法尼亚、乔治亚和亚利桑那这三州显示的非法选票比拜登的获胜优势还多。以上这是基于True the Vote定义骡子的高标准（至少10次访问了投票箱）。如果将门槛降低到计算访问次数至少5次的人，估计受影响的选票将增加一倍以上。
影片还批评包括美联社、Politifact在内的事实核查机构具有误导性或存在缺陷。
2020年选举，与以往选举不一样，不只是政党轮替，而是关系到美国人是否能保持自己的生活方式。我特别关心这场大选，因此，有关选举舞弊的一切信息，我基本都看了，2021年亚历桑那州对该州选票的法务审计及其他相关调查报告，我也看了。因此这部《2000 Mule》中的内容，我完全不吃惊，知道这只是再现了冰山一角。
问题在于：现在掌握了行政、国会、司法检察系统的民主党根本不打算放弃2020年使用的选举机器，共和党似乎也没什么办法制止这种情况。民主党也未打算放弃这种做法，甚至将这一手法用到自家党内初选上来。2022年6月6日，乔治亚州曝出重磅丑闻：在民主党中期选举中，争夺第二区地方官选举的有三个候选人，最后一名叫米歇尔Michelle Long Spears，投票机显示她在自己的选区得票数为0。而她和丈夫二人都投了自己的票，得票数至少应该为2。
米歇尔要求手工点票，手工点票的结果是多得了数千票，从而使她的得票数在三个候选人中从第三跃居第一。
这种投票机，正是2020大选所使用的多米尼投票机。
多米尼机器有问题，但就是不能换
尽管多家民调都表明拜登与民主党今年的选情不妙，但我清楚地知道，只要多米尼机器继续投入使用，民主党未必落败。
多米尼选举机器在选举安全方面的缺陷并非秘密。2020年大选之前，不仅美国选举委员会及相关专家早就知道，大选之后宣传Dominion系统是安全的几家主流媒体其实在大选前也曾报道过。
我在《2020大选：高科技资本深度参与的数据政变》（2020年12月）一文中将我在推特上介绍过的事实集中说明：The Technology that Drives Government IT（GCN，一家提供技术评估，建议和案例研究，支持负责规范，评估和选择技术解决方案的公共部门IT经理的行业协会）上找到2019年1月和2020年1月的两篇文章，连标题都极为相似，一篇是《选举安全行为准则：是否太少太迟》；《选举机器安全：是否太少太迟？》，作者是德里克·B·约翰逊（Derek B. Johnson）。这两篇时隔一年的文章讲的是同一件事情：2019年1月，美国选举委员会在关于选举机器安全性的听证会中指出，Dominion公司的机器安全标准仅涵盖投票系统的技术方面，未涉及可能对选举产生影响的网络安全。各州与会者指出，联邦选举委员会颁发了《自愿投票系统指南》，但不少州可能没有时间在2020年选举之前针对新标准测试其系统。密歇根大学教授兼选举安全专家亚历克斯·霍尔德曼（Alex Haldeman）在会上指出，更新后的标准“范围相对较弱”，不包括有关选举后审核和安全选举系统其他整体组成部分的指南。他要求立法者要求各州和投票机供应商遵守最低限度的可行安全法规，以作为联邦资助的条件。
2020年1月9日，全美选举委员会再次就选举机器的安全性开会，一些专家警告说，Dominion机器不利于有效的选民核实和选举后的审核程序。对公司的软件和硬件供应链也存在担忧，因为至少有一个主要的投票系统供应商从中国采购零件和组件。但各州官员表示，在大选之前来不及改正了。
结合美国选举委员会2019年、2020年两次关于机器安全性能听证的结果，结论是：早就发现Dominion的安全有问题，而且就出在不能核查选民身份与不能事后审计这两点；中国提供部件也是事实。但美国多数州还是无视选举安全专家的警告采用了（据说不少州购买Dominion系统拿了回扣，对乔治亚州长与州务卿就有过这类指控）。
《纽约时报》、CNN在前几年都曾报道过美国选举机器系统出错的问题。远的不说，彭博社2020年1月3日就发表过一篇《美国不会放弃易被入侵的无线投票机器》，这篇文章以密西根州的投票系统为重点，指出Dominion系统两个大问题：一是即使短暂连接到互联网，哪怕只有接一毫秒就足以通过系统传播恶意软件；二是地方政府将熟悉性，便利性和可访问性放置安全性之上，任何人都可以进入系统操作，导致安全隐患。事实上，2020年大选之夜拜登曲线就出现在密西根州。这是不是故意留下的作弊后门，只要看民主党为此做的法律准备就知道了。
今年是否有可能换掉这种已经被事实证明偷票的投票机？只要看看极度左倾的左派NGO布伦南中心的态度就知道了。2022年3月1日，布伦南中心和验证投票的联合分析“发现”：近年来，对机器投票结果建模分析，发现其中一些“翻转”投票，是因为老化硬件相关的校准错误，触摸屏错误地记录了选民的选择。这反过来又导致了病毒视频和机器“窃取选票”的阴谋论。但结论是：更换老化的投票设备将花费数亿美元，各州没有钱做这事。
美国民主一线命脉正悬在现在的多米尼投票机上，但美国朝野的关注点似乎不在这件事上。美国总统拜登此时正忙于在全国推广青少年变性，支持美国女性反对最高法院推翻保护堕胎权判例的判决，他会特批几亿美元帮助各州更换投票机吗？各州会采用手工点票这种可靠但笨拙的点票方式吗？
大纪元首发
责任编辑：朱颖
所有跟贴:
He Qinglian: The lifeblood of American democracy hangs on voting machines. The old Merkel-Xitler exploited voting machines
All Posts · Add Posts · Forum Home Page
Submitted by: Cum the diaper into the White House! On February 21, 2023 05:23:38:
He Qinglian: The lifeblood of American democracy hangs on voting machines. Old bastard Merkel-Old fool Xi Taylor used voting machines
All comments·Add comments·Forum home page
Submitted by: Shoot diapers into the White House! On June 27, 2022 03:08:04:
He Qinglian: The lifeline of American democracy hangs on the voting machines.
He Qinglian: The lifeline of American democracy hangs on the voting machines.
The shortcomings of Dominion’s election machines in election security are not a secret. The picture shows a Dominion touch-screen voting machine. (Li Wenjing/The Epoch Times)
Updated 2022-06-27 2:25 AM Popularity 168 Tags: US midterm elections, three indicators, 2000 mules, Dominion voting machine Facebook Twitter Line Copy link Print [Font Size] Large, Medium, Small Traditional Simplified
[ The Epoch Times, June 27, 2022] The 2022 midterm elections are approaching. Many commentators believe that Republicans have many favorable factors: an unpopular president, a Democratic social base that drives normal members of society crazy, and an inability to The highest inflation in 41 years while blaming others. Therefore, the Republican side is confident that its best record will include winning back the House of Representatives and even the Senate, and being able to retain its majorities in statehouses and governorships. The Republican Party's confidence is not unfounded. Gallup, a well-known investigative organization, said in a report released in mid-June that "2022 is very likely to be the year when the Republican Party will usher in an overwhelming victory."
Gallup: All three conventional indicators of the midterm elections are sluggish.
In this report, Gallup investigated three indicators that are indicative of the results of the U.S. midterm elections: the current president’s public approval rating, Congressional public opinion approval rating, and public opinion. Satisfaction with the status quo.
The Gallup report shows that the current public satisfaction level with Biden is about 41%. Compared with the approval ratings of previous U.S. presidents before the midterm elections, Biden's current approval rating of 41% is at a lower level. It is the same as Trump's approval rating in the 2018 election, when the Republican Party lost 40 House seats. Former US President Ronald Reagan's approval rate in 1982 was 42%, which also caused the Republican Party to lose 26 seats.
The report shows that the current public support rate for the U.S. Congress is 18%, the lowest point since 1974. The report stated that during Obama’s first term, Congress’ approval rate was 21%, and the Democratic Party lost 63 seats; in 2018, when Trump was in office, Congress’s approval rate was 21%, and the Republican Party lost 40 seats.
At the same time, this report also shows that the current satisfaction level of American people with the current domestic situation is 16%, which is the lowest point since 2010.
According to the report, based on the results of the multi-state primary elections that have been released, the Democratic Party is likely to suffer a "significant shock" in the November mid-term elections and repeat the mistakes of the 1994 and 2010 mid-term elections, when the Democratic Party lost ground after the election. A large number of congressional seats and control of Congress.
This is not only the conclusion of Gallup's polls. The 538 website evaluates Biden's support rate by analyzing various poll results and using its own poll scoring system. As of June 24, Eastern Time, Biden's The support rate is 39.2%, and the proportion who do not support Biden is 55.3%.
Can the Republican Party just sit back and win without worries? My opinion is: given the experience of the 2020 election, we should not be too optimistic.
2000 Mules: The tip of the iceberg of fraud in the 2020 election.
Starting on May 2 this year, a documentary "2000 Mules" (2000 Mules) was released in more than 250 theaters across the United States. The film focuses on alleged voter fraud and fraud in swing states in the 2020 election. The crime of ballot stuffing, produced by conservative activist Dinesh D'Souza. The name "mule" comes from the fact that the Republican Party's emblem is a red image, while the Democratic Party's is a blue donkey. "Mule" is used to refer to the intermediaries employed in the 2020 election. The film uses cell phone tracking, digital geofencing, and surveillance footage of absentee ballot drop boxes to show that thousands of "mules" were hired to illegally collect and deliver hundreds of thousands of absentee ballots, changing the outcome of the election. .
"2000 Mules" documents research by the conservative election intelligence group True the Vote, which collected evidence of organized ballot trafficking in six states: Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and Texas. In the case of Georgia, True the Vote claims that 242 "mules" went to the ballot boxes 5,662 times between 12 a.m. and 5 a.m., possibly stuffing hundreds of thousands of illegally obtained ballots over the course of several weeks. to the ballot box. The employers of mules are some parasitic NGOs under the Democratic Party. They have been receiving funding from the Democratic Party for many years and doing dirty work for the Democratic Party to make a living. Three of those states, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona, showed more illegal votes than Biden won by a margin of victory. The above is based on True the Vote’s high standard of defining a mule (at least 10 visits to the ballot box). If the threshold were lowered to count people who visited at least five times, the estimated number of affected votes would more than double.
The film also criticizes fact-checking organizations including the Associated Press and Politifact as misleading or flawed.
The 2020 election is different from previous elections. It is not just about the rotation of political parties, but about whether Americans can maintain their way of life. I am particularly concerned about this election, so I have read basically all the information about election fraud. I have also read the 2021 Arizona forensic audit of the state’s votes and other related investigation reports. Therefore, the content in "2000 Mule" does not surprise me at all, knowing that this is just the tip of the iceberg.
The problem is: the Democratic Party, which now controls the executive, congressional, judicial and prosecutorial systems, has no intention of giving up the election machines used in 2020, and the Republican Party seems to have no way to stop this situation. The Democratic Party has no intention of giving up this approach, and has even used this method in its own party primaries. On June 6, 2022, a major scandal was revealed in Georgia: In the Democratic midterm elections, there were three candidates vying for the District 2 magistrate election. The last one was Michelle Long Spears. The voting machine showed that she was The number of votes in his own constituency is 0. Both she and her husband cast their votes, and the number of votes should be at least 2.
Michelle asked for a hand count, which resulted in thousands more votes, pushing her from third to first among the three candidates.
This kind of voting machine is exactly the Dominion voting machine used in the 2020 general election.
There is a problem with the Domini machine, but it cannot be replaced
. Although many polls indicate that the situation between Biden and the Democratic Party is not good this year, I know clearly that as long as the Domini machine continues to be put into use, the Democratic Party may not lose.
The shortcomings of Dominion’s election machines in terms of election security are no secret. Before the 2020 election, not only the U.S. Election Commission and relevant experts had known for a long time, but several mainstream media outlets that promoted the Dominion system as safe after the election had actually reported it before the election.
In the article "2020 Election: A Data Coup with Deep Involvement of High-tech Capital" (December 2020), I concentrated on the facts I introduced on Twitter: The Technology that Drives Government IT (GCN, a company that provides technology assessments, Advice and case studies, an industry association that supports public sector IT managers responsible for specifying, evaluating and selecting technology solutions) found two articles from January 2019 and January 2020. Even the titles are very similar, one is " Code of Conduct for Election Security: Too Little Too Late"; "Election Machine Security: Too Little Too Late? ” by Derek B. Johnson. These two articles, one year apart, are about the same thing: In January 2019, the U.S. Election Commission pointed out during a hearing on the security of election machines that Dominion’s machine security standards only cover the technical aspects of voting systems. Cybersecurity, which could have an impact on the election, was not addressed. State participants noted that the Federal Election Commission issued Guidelines for Voluntary Voting Systems, but many states may not have time to test their systems against the new standards before the 2020 elections. University of Michigan professor and election security expert Alex Haldeman noted at the meeting that the updated standards are “relatively weak in scope” and do not include information on post-election audits and other integral components of secure election systems. guide. He asked lawmakers to require states and voting machine vendors to comply with minimum feasible security regulations as a condition of federal funding.
On January 9, 2020, the National Election Commission met again on the security of election machines. Some experts warned that Dominion machines are not conducive to effective voter verification and post-election audit procedures. There are also concerns about the company's software and hardware supply chain, as at least one major voting system supplier sources parts and components from China. But state officials said there was too little time to correct it before the election.
Combining the results of two hearings on machine safety performance by the U.S. Election Commission in 2019 and 2020, the conclusion is that Dominion’s security problems have long been discovered, and they are due to the inability to verify the identity of voters and the inability to audit afterwards; China provides components It's also true. However, most states in the United States still ignored the warnings of election security experts and adopted it (it is said that many states received kickbacks when purchasing Dominion systems, and there were such accusations against the governor and secretary of state of Georgia).
The New York Times and CNN have reported on system errors in U.S. election machines in the past few years. Not to mention, Bloomberg published an article on January 3, 2020, "The United States Will Not Give Up Easily Hacked Wireless Voting Machines." This article focused on the voting system in Michigan and pointed out two major problems with the Dominion system. Problems: First, even a brief connection to the Internet, even a millisecond, is enough to spread malware through the system; second, local governments put familiarity, convenience and accessibility above security, and anyone can enter the system to operate. , leading to safety hazards. In fact, the Biden Curve appeared in Michigan on election night 2020. Whether this is a deliberate backdoor for cheating or not, you only need to look at the legal preparations made by the Democratic Party for this.
Is it possible to replace voting machines this year that have been proven to steal votes? Just look at the attitude of the ultra-leftist NGO Brennan Center. March 1, 2022, joint analysis by the Brennan Center and Verified Voting “finds”: Modeling analyzes of machine voting results in recent years have found that some of those “flipped” votes were due to calibration errors related to aging hardware, touch screens Voter choices were incorrectly recorded. This in turn has led to viral videos and conspiracy theories that machines "steal votes." But the bottom line: Replacing aging voting equipment would cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and states don’t have the money to do it.
The lifeline of American democracy hangs on the current Dominican voting machines, but the focus of the U.S. government and opposition parties does not seem to be on this matter. U.S. President Biden is currently busy promoting transgender teenagers across the country and supporting American women’s opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn legal precedents protecting abortion rights. Will he specifically approve hundreds of millions of dollars to help states replace voting machines? Will states resort to the reliable but clunky method of counting votes by hand?
Epoch Times first release
Editor in charge: Zhu Ying
All comments:
所有跟贴: